What does
Antarctica have to do with space law? The Soviet Union launched the first
artificial satellite, Sputnik 1 into orbit on October 4, 1957. This was not
only the entrance of mankind into outer space; it was also the event that
triggered the emergence of Space Law. Coincidentally the Antarctic Treaty was
signed on December 1, 1959 by the twelve countries whose scientists had been
active in and around Antarctica during the International Geophysical Year (IGY)
of 1957-58.
The Antarctic Treaty
System (signed into force in 1961) states as its primary purpose to
ensure “in the
interests of all mankind that Antarctica shall continue forever to be used exclusively
for peaceful purposes and shall not become the scene or object of international
discord.”
Other Provisions of the Treaty
state:
Antarctica shall be used for
peaceful purposes only (Art. I).
Freedom of scientific
investigation in Antarctica and cooperation toward that end … shall continue
(Art. II).
If these
provisions seem familiar that is becuase they are very similar to the Outer Space Treaty which believes,
"that the exploration and use of outer space should be carried on for
the benefit of all peoples irrespective of the degree of their economic or
scientific development."
The
exploration and use of outer space...be carried out for the benefit and in the
interests of all countries… and shall be the province of all mankind (Art.
I)
There shall be
freedom of scientific investigation in outer space, including the Moon and
other celestial bodies, and States shall facilitate and encourage international
cooperation in such investigation (Art. I).
Outer space,
including the Moon and other celestial bodies, is not subject to national
appropriation by claim of sovereignty, by means of use or occupation, or by any
other means (Art. II).
States Parties
to the Treaty shall carry on activities in the exploration and use of outer
space… in the interest of… promoting international cooperation and
understanding (Art. III).
Antarctica, like
outer space is considered to be an extreme and remote environment. So much so
that the Mars Society, is conducting a 2,000
mile trans-Antarctic expedition "to
test how extreme and remote environments affect human physiology, providing
important insight into the challenge of sending humans to the Red Planet."
The two year mission will focus on a
variety of analog research, including:
Prolonged periods of complete
isolation (7-9 months in duration)
Experiencing altered day-night
cycles (including 3-4 months of complete darkness)
Exposure to extreme cold and weather (in the coldest desert with extremely low humidity)
Encountering chronic hypobaric hypoxia (including altitudes of up to 3,200 meters)
Exposure to extreme cold and weather (in the coldest desert with extremely low humidity)
Encountering chronic hypobaric hypoxia (including altitudes of up to 3,200 meters)
Antarctica and
outer space are similar on a number of levels whether it is between the
treaties that define the parameters of their use or the "extreme and
remote" conditions. The other similarity is that both Antarctica and outer
space are sovereignless. This was discussed in the following case regarding the
Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA):
Smith v U.S. 507 US 197
(1993)
In Smith, the court was asked to
decide if the U.S. can be held liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA)
for a wrongful death that occurred in Antarctica. The court held that the
ordinary meaning of foreign country included Antarctica even though it had no
recognized government. If Antarctica was not a foreign country then the
plaintiff would have limited legal options because the court would have to look
to the laws of Antarctica which has no law to determine the liability of the
U.S. The Court points out that legislation of the U.S. is meant to apply only
within the territorial jurisdiction of the U.S. unless there is contrary congressional
intent.
Justice Stevens
acknowledged Antarctica's similarity to outer space in his dissent:
"The negligence that is
alleged in this case will surely have its parallels in outer space as our
astronauts continue their explorations of ungoverned regions far beyond the
jurisdictional boundaries that were familiar to the Congress that enacted the
Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) in 1946."
Antarctica, like outer space, is sovereignless, remote, and of scientific and military interest. The biggest differenc is when you slip in Antarctica you fall. When you slip in outer space you float.
No comments:
Post a Comment